dorsal column stimulators state of maryland

North R, Kidd D, Campbell J, Long D: Dorsal root ganglionectomy for failed back surgery syndrome: a five-year follow-up study. North R, Kidd D, Lee M, Piartodosi S: A prospective randomized study of spinal cord stimulation versus reoperation for failed back surgery syndrome: initial results. Ohrmeiss D, Rashbaum R, Bogdanffy G: Prospective outcome evaluation of spinal cord stimulation in patients with intractable leg pain. Robaina FJ, Dominguez M, Diaz M, et al.: Spinal cord stimulation for relief of chronic pain in vasospastic disorders of the upper limbs. Kumar K, Nath R, Toth C: Spinal cord stimulation is effective in the management of reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Kemler MA: Spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Segal R, Stacey BR, Rudy TE, et al.: Spinal cord stimulation revisited. Kumar K, Nath R: Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain in peripheral neuropathy. Neurosurgery 1995, 37:1088–1096.ĭe la Porte C, Van de Kelft E: Spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome. Turner J, Loeser J, Bell K: Spinal cord stimulation for chronic low back pain: a systematic literature synthesis. Gives a good overview for the general pain practitioner. J Urol 1995, 154:504–507.ĭeer T: The role of neuromodulation by spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain syndromes: current concepts. Neurosurgery 1997, 41:654–660.īosh J, Groen J: Sacral (S3) segmental nerve stimulation as a treatment for urge incontinence in patients with detrusor instability: results of chronic electrical stimulation using an implantable neural prosthesis. Holsheimer J, Wesselink W: Effects of anode and cathode configurations on paresthesia coverage in spinal cord stimulation. North R: The role of spinal cord stimulation in contemporary pain management. Krames E: Mechanisms of action of spinal cord stimulation. Melzack P, Wall P: Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Olson K: The value of multiple sources of data in decision making. A good reference for the retrograde technique. Spine 1996, 21:2786–2794.Īlo KM, Gohel R, Corey CL: Sacral nerve root stimulation for the treatment of urge incontinence and detrusor dysfunction utilizing a cephalocaudal intraspinal method of lead insertion: a case report. Pain Forum 1996, 5:93–103.īurchiel KJ, Anderson VC, Brown FD, et al.: Prospective, multicenter study of spinal cord stimulation for relief of chronic back and extremity pain. Nelson D: Psychological selection criteria for implantable spinal cord stimulators. New York: Churchill Livingston 1996:56–98. This article helps form the current understanding of SCS from the theoretic, clinical, and economic standpoint.ĭoleys D, Murray J, Coleton M: Behavioral medicine/psychological assessment of the pain patient. J Pain Symptom Manage 1997, 13:296–301.īell G, Kidd D, Noah R: Cost-effectiveness analysis of spinal cord stimulator in treatment of failed back surgery syndrome. Pain 1991, 44:119–130.ĭeVulder J, Delaat M, Van Basteluere J, Rolly G: The benefits of total implantability. North R, Ewerd M, Lawton M, Piantudosi S: Spinal cord stimulation for chronic, intractable pain: superiority of “multichannelrd devices. Spiegelmann W: Spinal cord stimulation: a contemporary series. North R, Kidd D, Fabarch M, et al.: Spinal cord stimulators for chronic, intractable pain experience over two decades. North R, Ewerd M, Lawton M: Failed back surgery syndrome: five year follow-up after spinal cord stimulation implantation.

Shealy C, Mortimer J, Reswik J: Electrical inhibitors of pain by stimulation of the dorsal column. Technologic advances such as multi-lead and multi-electrode arrays are also discussed in regard to the impact these developments have on the clinical application of the therapy.

A review is provided for the treatment of radiculitis, failed back surgery syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome, peripheral neuropathies, pelvic pain, occipital neuralgia, angina, ischemic extremity pain, and spasticity. This review focuses on the selection, indications, techniques, new advances, complications, and outcomes involved with SCS.

These advances have broadened the treatment options for many patients in pain. Over the past 30 years selection criteria, psychologic screening, and technology have improved. First used clinically in 1967, the procedure was used exclusively for failed back surgery syndrome. Because there are no addictive issues and no side effects systemically, the treatment is moving up the treatment continuum ladder. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a reversible treatment for chronic pain that is gaining favor as a first-line therapy for many disease states.

Dorsal column stimulators state of maryland